摘抄自Stack Project 和J. Alper 的stack and moduli. Descent theory 主旨在于如何进行base change的逆过程. 最重要的结果便是faithful flat morphism 可以induce 出category of quasi-coherent sheaves 和category of quasi-coherent sheaves with descent data 的等价, 进而导出一系列morphism 上的性质. 在moduli theory 中descent theory 主要用于gluing data.
Descending quasi-coherent sheaves
Proposition 1. If ϕ:A→B os a faithfully flat map, then
0→AϕBb↦b⊗1b↦1⊗bB⊗AB
is exact. More generally, if M is an A-module, then
0→Mm↦m⊗1M⊗ABm⊗b↦m⊗b⊗1m⊗b↦m⊗1⊗bM⊗AB⊗AB
is exact.
Proposition 2. Let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes.
Let F amd G be quasi-coherent OS-modules. Let p1,p2:S′×SS′ be two projections and q:S′×SS′→S be the composition f∘pi/ Then the sequence
Let H be the quasi-coherent OS′-module and α:p1∗H→p2∗ be an isomorphism of OS′×SS′-module satisfying the cocycle condition p23∗α∘p12∗α=p13∗α on S′×SS′×SS′. Then there exists a quasi-coherent OS-module G and an isomorphism ϕ:H→f∗G such that p1∗ϕ=p2∗ϕ∘α on S′×SS′. The data (G,ϕ) is unique up to isomorphism. The cocycle condition can be visualized as
Descending morphisms
Proposition 3. Let Y be a scheme and f:S′→S be a fpqc morphism of schemes. If g:S′→Y is a morphism such that g∘p1=g∘p2 then there exists a unique morphism h:S→Y such that g=h∘f.
Proposition 4. Let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes.
If S→T os a morphism of schemes and Y is a T-scheme then
Proposition 5. Let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes. If Z′⊂S′ is a closed (resp. open) subscheme such that p1−1(Z′)=p2−1(Z′) as subschemes of S′×SS′, then there exists a closed (resp. open) subscheme Z⊂S such that Z′=f−1(Z).
Proposition 6. Let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes. If X′→S′ is affine (resp. quasi-affine) morphism and α:p1∗(X′)∼p2∗(X′) is an isomorphism over S′×SS′ satisfying p23∗α∘p12∗α=p13∗α, then there exists an affine (resp. quasi-affine) morphism X→S of schemes, and an isomorphism ϕ:X′→f∗(X) over S′ such that p1∗ϕ=p2∗ϕ∘α.
Theorem 1. Let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes. If X′→S′ is locally quasi-finite and separated morphism of schemes. α:p1∗(X′)∼p2∗(X′). Then there exists an locally quasi-finite and separated morphism X→S of schemes and an isomorphism ϕ:X′→f∗(X) over S′ such that p1∗ϕ=p2∗ϕ∘α.
Proposition 7. Let G→T be an fppf affine group scheme and let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes over T. If P′→S′ is a principal G-bundle and α:p1∗P′∼p2∗P′ is an isomorphism of principal G-bundle. Then there exists a principal G-bundle P→S and an isomorphism ϕ:P′→f∗P of principal G-bundles such that p1ϕ=p2∗ϕ∘α.
Descending properties
Proposition 8. Let f:S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes.
A homomorphism F→G of quasi-coherent OS′-modules is an isomorphism (resp. injective, surjective) if and only if f∗F→f∗G is.
A quasi-coherent OS-module F is of finite type (resp. of finite presentation, flat, vector bundle, line bundle) if and only if f∗G is. If S and S′ are noetherian, then the same holds for coherence.
A quasi-coherent OX-module F on a S-scheme X is flat over S if and only if the pullback of F to XS′ is flat over S′.
Proposition 9. Let X→Y be an fpqc morphism of schemes. If X is quasi-compact (resp. locally noetherian, noetherian, integral, reduced, normal, regular), then so is Y.
Proposition 10. Let X′→X be an fpqc morphism of schemes. If X→Y is a morphism such that X′→X→Y is smooth (resp. etale), then X→Y is smooth (resp. etale).
Proposition 11. If X→Y is an fppf morphism of schemes, then X is locally noetherian if and only if Y is.
If X→Y is surjective smooth morphism of schemes, then X is reduced (resp. normal, regular) if and only if Y is.
Proposition 12. Let S′→S be an fpqc morphism of schemes and P be one of the following properties of a morphism of schemes: surjective, quasi-compact, quasi-separated, isomorphism, open immersion, closed immersion, monomorphism, affine, quasi-affine, quasi-compact locally closed immersion, locally of finite type, locally of finite presentation, separated, proper, universally closed, universally open, universally submersive, finite, locally quasi-finite, quasi-finite, flat, fppf, smooth, étale, unramified, or syntomic. Then X→S has P if and only if X×SS′→S′ does.